I really enjoyed this week's readings because they offered comprehensive reading strategies that can be applied to any subject area, including mathematics. The Bean, Baldwin, and Readence chapter mentioned several of these strategies. I particularly enjoyed the polar opposite strategy because there is no right or wrong answer, as long as students justify their answer. This seems to fit very well into the new common core state standards, which encourage students to justify their answers. Although there are usually right and wrong answers in mathematics, I believe that by supporting the reasoning of their solution, students will determine the right answer to a problem. We are always stressing for our students to be able to explain how they got their solutions.
Sunday, October 13, 2013
Reflection #6: Reading Comprehension Strategies
I really enjoyed this week's readings because they offered comprehensive reading strategies that can be applied to any subject area, including mathematics. The Bean, Baldwin, and Readence chapter mentioned several of these strategies. I particularly enjoyed the polar opposite strategy because there is no right or wrong answer, as long as students justify their answer. This seems to fit very well into the new common core state standards, which encourage students to justify their answers. Although there are usually right and wrong answers in mathematics, I believe that by supporting the reasoning of their solution, students will determine the right answer to a problem. We are always stressing for our students to be able to explain how they got their solutions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I like the idea of justification but I donT like the Idea that as long as you justify, you get credit. Colleges need students who can write and justify their proofs, but those proofs need to be correct! In the words of dr. Dobbs "you can justify all you want, but wrong is still wrong."
ReplyDelete